Battery revenue in Great Britain is a fixed point: the fleet moves the prices it is valued against. Our first paper treated the fleet as one class. The market doesn't — it builds one-, two- and four-hour batteries, financed on cases that take the rest of the fleet, and its duration mix, as given. So the question every storage investor actually asks is a cross-cannibalisation question.

The new working paper, Who Cannibalises Whom, answers it on the series' unchanged machinery: the three duration classes solved jointly with half-hourly price formation across sixty-three fleet mixes, and each class's revenue read as a function of every class's capacity.

Nobody's build helps anyone else

What this means

A duration decision made against today's fleet is made against a mix the decision itself will change. Each class's revenue case should be stressed against every other class's build, in both denominators — pounds and share — because which class bears the largest stress depends on which denominator a lender is looking at, and on a baseline duration ordering that the measured fleet inverts. Levels here are stylised; the signs, the own-effect ordering and the existence of two faces are the results.

As everywhere in this series, the claim to be trusted on is not the mechanism but the record — pre-registered, published as it landed, in a series whose backtest record is graded in public: The Graded Record.

Read the paper. CE-WP-2026-07 — Who Cannibalises Whom: Duration Classes at the Storage Equilibrium (9 pages). Companions: Cannibalisation as a Fixed Point and The Cannibalisation of Flexibility. The case-study bundle is available on request. Series: working papers and notes. Want the matrix run on your fleet's mix and costs? Ask.