A revenue forecast that holds prices fixed while the storage fleet grows overstates battery revenue by a factor that grows with the fleet. A lender does not underwrite a factor. A lender underwrites a debt service coverage ratio, year by year, against a covenant. This paper turns the bias into those two numbers.

On the series' unchanged stylised Great Britain equilibrium, From Bias to Bankability follows one two-hour battery, commissioned in 2027, through a fifteen-year tenor on two build-out paths, re-solving the equilibrium every year as the fleet grows, and passes the resulting revenue through a standard project-finance layer whose every input is stated.

The wedge has a term structure

What this means

For lenders: a storage case sized on today's price shape is not conservative by a margin a haircut recovers — on this machinery it is out of covenant within three years, because the fleet that erodes the revenue is built during the tenor, not before it. The right stress is the equilibrium track under the build-out path you believe, sized against its downside year. For sponsors: the reduction in debt capacity is the price of the bias, in the currency the bias is paid in.

Levels are stylised and badged; the downside track is the low of three synthetic weather years, not a P90. As everywhere in this series, the claim to be trusted on is not the mechanism but the record: The Graded Record.

Read the paper. CE-WP-2026-08 — From Bias to Bankability (9 pages). Companions: Cannibalisation as a Fixed Point and Who Cannibalises Whom. The case-study bundle is available on request. Series: working papers and notes. Want the term structure run on your asset, path and covenant package? Ask.